CNAME's are bad

I don't like them.  Let me say that straight away.
 
I have seen many stuff ups from CNAMES.  Most recently, someone used a  CNAME as their name server records for a domain.  It mostly worked - but some fussy DNS resolvers, such as the ones Bigpond use on their mail servers refused to resolve them and as such, they had time outs.  Took a little while to work this one out.
 
Other reasons they are bad:
 
Slower:  To lookup a CNAME, I have to make a request for the CNAME... and then a request for the A record of the returned query and then do my normal business (ie, send an email via SMPT).  A little more info here
 
Compatibility:  CNAMES are mostly client sided and as such; everyone seems to do it a little differently.  Due to this, there is inconsistency’s in how it works (some client software will work with CNAMES as MX records where as others will break and die).
 
Bad things can happen:  You can only use one CNAME to point to a host and not to another CNAME.  I've seen someone do a MX record of their domain point to their hosting company.  At a later date, the hosting company changed their mail server to be a CNAME to another server.  This broke things, of course.  You are not meant to use CNAMES to point to MX or NS records.  A little more info here
 
So saying all of that, CNAMES are bad. Stick with real records and just keep them up to date.  Don't be lazy and use CNAMES because it will bite you one day and you could spend some time thinking the issue is somewhere else (Like the Bipgond example at the top)
 
 

Posted by Alan Lee on Wednesday, January 20 2010

Info here first... the new apple iphone!

You heard it here first

I spent a few years of my life working my way into Apple to get the latest info here.  I have had to do this post anonymously otherwise they might fire me!  

The new Apple iPhone 4G!

Upgrades:
Increased battery life
Smaller screen
Faster CPU
More memory (unsure how much)
6x AA batterys
Stronger case / anti-scratch plastic

New things:
Real keyboard with buttons such as memory, code and on/off
Wrist Strap
Standard USB-A connection
More colours - Black, White, Blue and Orange (Orange pictured below)
Integrated dual line printer
User serviceable - has screws on side to pull apart

Pictures are below 
    

 

Posted by Alan Lee on Monday, January 18 2010

Windows 7 EPG for Australia (WMC/MCE)

Yes - it works.  It is about time!  The EPG (Electronic Programming Guide) has been missing from WMC (Windows Media Center) in Australia, for like - forever.  You used to have to use hacks, such as data scraping the Ninemsn website (many years ago) or a third party system from a vendor such as ICE to get this information.  

A few notes...

a) It wont actually download it via the internet, like you would expect.  But, it ties into the broadcast signal and then presents the information it finds that way.

b) It might take a bit of time to pickup the EPG - but if you cycle your channels, it should then start to see information.

c) As always - the TV studio's like to cause us pain, often things would start and/or finish later then they should have you might miss some recorded TV - best way around this is to increase the time buffer (I think up to 5 minutes each side of the show) or to record the show prior and after the show you wish to record.

I do not know if this works with Foxtel - as I don't have foxtel or any other paid forms of TV in my house.

I feel with TV these days - two recorders (ie, two tuners) is a little limiting and am thinking of getting a third for my system at home.

Posted by Alan Lee on Friday, October 30 2009

Windows 2008 Storage Server - A quick how-to

This is the quick and nasty install guide.......

Install it - either a physical server or a VM.  I used Hyper-V.  Straight away, I noticed it did not find my emulated SCSI drives while in the install process - so I went backwards, created an IDE drive and then installed it Windows 2008 Storage Server R2.

The default password is wSS2008!  Once you have installed the OS - please change the password.

I installed the updated Intergreation Serivces and then it found my SCSI drives (after I had installed the OS, of course)

Once that is done - you will want to download and install the following ... (log into MSDN etc)
en_windows_storage_server_2008_iscsi_cd_x64_x86_x15-49563.iso

It is also called 'Microsoft iSCSI Software Target 3.2 (x86 and x64) on Technet/MSDN etc.  I think that this is 64bit only (there is a 32bit version, but only seems to be the client software for remote machines to connect to your storage server but you should only be running a modern server in 64bit anyway - Hyper V supports 64bit guest operationg systems)

Once installed - you should have Microsoft iSCSI Software Target within Administrator tools.  From here, it should be dead simple.  I hope!

 

Posted by Alan Lee on Thursday, July 02 2009

Microsoft Windows 7 “Play to” under Build 7100

Play to is a new function under Windows 7 which helps brings the ‘home network’ into, well, more of a home network for you and me. It allows you to play (stream) media from one computer to another computer on your local network. Media could be music, videos or recorded TV.

It is based on streaming – and is smart enough to adjust itself to the network and resources of the machine you are playing the media to. It is not based on file sharing of the local network, and as such, you do not need to setup and file sharing between the machines. The actual file does not get transferred to the remote machine, so the remote machine cannot record or copy the media without third party programs or hardware. This function seems to have been created so it will not make groups such as the RIAA upset at Microsoft, but still easy and featured enough to be useful.

It is great because it works straight out of the box with minimal configuration. You do not need to install any additional software. As far as I can see, it should work on any version of Windows 7 (from home versions to ultimate etc). You do not need to have the fastest network, a simple wireless card running at 11mbit/s will be fine. Of course, you this will work great for audio but for video – you would want something a little faster.

From what I can see, there are xxx requirements to make “Play to” work under Windows 7

First – you need to be in the ‘home network’ group for networking. This means, if you are in a domain or public network – you will not be able to stream media from one device to another.


(picture of what the home network group looks like under networking and sharing)

Second – you need to have “Allow remote control of my player’ enabled under Stream of Media Player 11.


(the steps you need to perform under Media Player of the remote machine to enable streaming/play to)

Third – you need to have media player open on the remote computer. Please note – Windows Media Centre is not Media Player, and as such, if you have Media Centre open – the play to function will not work unless Media Player is open too (in the background).

Other then the above – dead simple. Once you have ‘allow remote control of my player’ enabled – from almost any media on your local machine, you can right click it and have a ‘play to’ menu which allows you to select the remote device. You can do this from inside a library, such as inside Media Player, a folder or a file. From my testing with single audio file – the remote computer started to play the song within a second. A video, 500mb uncompressed AVI started in 3 seconds.


(how you would play some media by right clicking on a file)


(this is what the host (ie, the machine you had the media on) will show - you can skip, pause, control audio levels etc)

There are still a few limits in the play to system. Probably the two most annoying at the moment is when I close Media Player on my machine, the remote machine can sometimes take 10 seconds to respond and stop playing the media. The second and most annoying missing feature is random. If I have a folder of 200 songs playing – there is repeat but no random which means it will start at song one, and continue until song 200.

But otherwise, this is a nice addition to Windows 7. I would love to see, or hear if they have addressed the random function in a later or RTM build.

 

Posted by Alan Lee on Monday, June 22 2009

Why Twitter needs a kick up the behind

Don’t get me wrong. Twitter is a wonderful tool. It fits perfectly in with the crowd that loves to social network, businesses that want to build their brand and half a million SEO experts. It is kinda like Facebook, without all of the annoying applications. If Twitter ever decided I could send someone a flower via a few clicks, I think I will join Ewen Wallace and we will build a bigger mouse trap without virtual flowers.

Twitter can be best described as a bunch of short messages, from one person (yourself) to many other people (your followers) (works both ways). Your messages can be about anything, such as a funny website you have just found, what you are doing at work, what you are doing over the weekend or a question to your followers. By default – twitter is boring – you need to find interesting people to follow to make it exciting. It helps to be interactive – if you see someone ask a question, try and answer it if it is something you understand. Try and be funny. Have some fun

But saying all of that, Twitter does have its faults. Twitter has recently announced it has 50 people working for them. Yet, some basic things are still broken. Take the ‘Remember me’ tick-box on the front page of their website for your login details. It does not work. How long does it take to fix a server sided cookie issue? Sure, allocate one person for a day and it should be fixed.

Also annoying is how they would implement things and changes, without really communicating to people about what they would like to do. The reply issue is a prime example. They tried to cover the change by saying it was a function which no one really used or understood. A few days later, they came out with the truth that it was due to load on their servers. Why not come out straight away and tell the world that this was the issue? You would have gained the respect of a bunch of people about being open with issues and how you intend on fixing them.

News letters – I have been with Twitter for over two years now yet I have never received one. Do you guys ever intend on producing one? Have you actually sent one? I only found out about your blog address when this huge reply issue came about.

There are other things which I find annoying, like hard to get an idea of if the people you are following are following you back, how there is AJAX to refresh over 75% of the page (click the Direct Messages button) and how there is no transparency or way to vote for someone to be in the recommended following system (like when you sign up for a new account). Some stats or information, such as including a ‘notes’ area for someone who is following you would also be nice (like, hell the hell am I meant to remember why I decided to follow some people or if they changed their name/picture etc).

Twitter can become better. You guys are 95% there already. It is just the last 5% that you need to work on. It is the little things, like the ‘contact us’ system which needs to be improved. I tried to lodge a request the other week, but went around in circles and then could not find a simple way, such as email, to contact you guys. I ended up giving up. I have heard people lodge trouble tickets and get back simple replies such as ‘problem solved, ticket is now closed’ of which did not help or solve any issues. A news letter every so often would also be nice – it will remind the people who have forgotten about the service that you guys are still there and wishing for them to return to new features, exciting adjustments and wonderful new people to follow

It is all of the little things, like if you ban someone for something, give them a reason and be responsive with dialog to and from them. Not everyone is a spammer so treat people better if you decide they need a time out.

You guys are in communication – you guys just need to do it better to your users before someone invents a bigger mouse trap. It is the little things

That is all – have a good evening

Posted by Alan Lee on Friday, June 19 2009

Information regarding Windows 7 software Raid

Quick info:

Raid 0 (Spanning/Stripped) is supported in every Windows 7 version (Beta/RC and RTM/Final) using software raid
Raid 1 (Mirror) is supported in Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate (Beta/RC and RTM/Final) using software raid

Raid 5 is not support in Windows 7 (Beta/RC and RTM/Final) using software raid.  You will need to use hardware (ie, a raid controller) or use a server operating system for Software raid.

WIthout doing any major testing - you will more then likly find a hardware raid controller (even using a built-in raid controller on your system board) will perform better then the software solution.  Software Raid may perform faster if your hardware controller is using outdated technologies.

Software raid in Windows 7 is dependant on using Dynamic Disks.  Because the Windows 7 does not give you a chance to create a disk as dynamic during the install process - you will need to do this afterwards.  As such - you will need to install Windows 7 on a single non-raid disc and the convert it to dynamic / add the extra drive after you have installed the OS.  I suggest you perform the raid adjustments fairly early after installing Windows 7 to ensure you either get performance (Raid 0) or reliability (Raid 1).

 

Above:  Windows 7 Ultimate / Enterprise edition software raid creation screen

Above:  The right click menu from Windows 7 Home Premium.  Please note there is no Mirror support in Home Premium (Thanks for Jim's comment)

Posted by Alan Lee on Tuesday, June 16 2009

My thoughts on Bing

Straight off - I have never really used Bing yet. I am not looking at the search results but the actual interface, the search results layout and what I feel about it

The Bing home page
I don’t feel there should be a huge image on the first page. Sure it might be compressed a lot, and/or not eat much traffic to come on your screen. I feel it should not be there because it is distracting.

The tabs provided are what most people would be interested in – images, videos, news and maps. Google does do the same, but it is not as clear on how to get there because they are hidden off at the top of the page. Both sites do a website reload to go between the tabs (ie, going from web to images). It would be nice if this was AJAX or something as it will make it quicker. This will be hard for Google, since they use a different URL for each search system where as the Bing product should be pretty easy to do since it is staying in the same domain.

The more button on Bing is not really a more page at the moment. It is still beta, and one would suspect there will be more and more things there over time.

A nice feature which should not be that hard to implement would be to have a webpage somewhere (probably require a login and/or cookies) where you can add websites. This would be like doing a site:www.alanjlee.com under Google but adding a shortcut / radio button for it. You would enter the site details from an accounts or profile page I would guess.  See picture below

The Bing search results page
This to me feels like a domain parked website for some reason. Maybe it is because there is a left hand collum before the results? Maybe it is because there is an image at the top left? Maybe because the content on the right hand side takes up around half the space of the real results? But then I get the same feeling of a spam website / domain parked website when I see tings like Youtube links with images on Google.

I also don’t like to see pop-ups when I put my mouse over things. Forums which do this, I hate with a passion. They have made it on Bing to do this when you hover your mouse over the right hand side of the search results.

So Bing – when will we be able to create accounts to personalise the home page and the results page?

Posted by Alan Lee on Sunday, June 14 2009

Cooking with Alan

So I have worked on a secret project for a few days.

I now have a cooking website where I list the things I enjoy to make, offer great ideas on cooking and general advice

Check it out... www.cookingwithalan.com

Please let me know what you think...  :)

Posted by Alan Lee on Saturday, June 13 2009

Cool stuff about Windows 7 Media Center functions

Just wow - there are a ton of cool things in relation to Windows 7 and its Media Centre / Media Player functions.
Here are a few (Please note, this is not a RTM review of the full non-beta Windows 7, things may and will change)
 
Out of the box formats (codec wise): 
DivX up to version 6 (DivX 7 was released a few days back, not sure if it will be included in the final version yet) 
DVD support (mpeg2) - can play DVD's straight away after installing Windows 7
H.264 & AAC audio (unless it has DRM, cause Apple wont license it to any third parties) 
 
Things you still need (codec wise): 
Adobe Flash Player
Blu-Ray codec
Codec packs for things like MKV
QuickTime still is a good idea to install
 
This is a welcome change from Microsoft and will make life a bit easier
 
Streaming Media
This is a big leap for Microsoft to try and make Windows 7 the centre point of your entertainment system.  It seems that if it is on your Windows 7 box - and you are based on a home network (please note, Active Directory/Domain Controller networks won’t work due to that not really been a home product) - you can stream and/or play media on anything else in your home which is part of the DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance, over 200 companies are part of this).  Media Player ties into the home network a lot more.
 
Media Center
This is just wow.  It runs a lot smoother.  It has far more funky features and it just works.  Things like EPG in Australia actually work!  It is based on the broadcaster’s signal which I suspect is part of how FreeView works here.  Things like if you hold the skip button, it starts to do days at a time on the EPG so you can get around faster.  The animations of moving around are just win.  
 
The home network
This is something I feel Microsoft have improved a lot since Windows XP and Windows Vista.  They have made it a lot easier to share things around the network such as documents and audio/video.  You can from a bunch of simple screens setup a password which authenticates everything to the network.  It ties in with your Live ID (maybe others in the future) to link both internal and external devices together.  
 
What I am doing
I got a few ideas of things I can do at home to make things just work better.  I have reinstalled my main PC at home to have Windows 7 (7100).  I am going to move away from AD at home and into a home network type setup.  I will be doing more reviews, screenshots, correcting the above if there are mistakes and just overall trying to make this less complicated.  There are a few 'gotchyas' which I still have to find myself.  I'll also try and put together some ideas and/or ideal type setups for people to have an idea of what can be done.
 
So - stay tuned... hopefully in a few day's I will have a lot more information here.
 
Thanks to Sydney Windows User Group and Gordon Ryan at Longneck Consulting for their demo on Media Center things
 
 

 

Posted by Alan Lee on Thursday, June 11 2009